The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

   7/5/2008
Advanced search


California Reform | K-12 Education

Improving Public Education in California


During the past quarter-century, expenditures per pupil in California have fallen nearly a quarter, in comparison to the national average. Education Week (2003) ranked California third worst in the nation in adequacy of resources for education.  According to EdSource (2003), an independent information-gathering organization, taxpayers spend about 3 percent of their personal income on K-12 education, 4oth in the nation. Despite a mid-1990s push to reduce class size in kindergarten through third grade, the state ranks 49th in the number of students per teacher. The U.S. average is about 16:1. In California, it’s nearly 21:1. That translates directly into less support for students.

The problem isn’t just the student-teacher ratio; it’s also the quality of instruction.  In 2001, some 42,000 instructors—as many as in half the states combined—lack teaching credentials, and 38,000 more are working with emergency permits.  Stanford Professor of Education Linda Darling-Hammond calculates that students attending schools whose enrollment is drawn from the lowest quartile of socioeconomic status (SES) are five times more likely to have underqualified teachers than students going to schools that draw come from the top SES quartile. 



Education Resources in California
How California Rates

Indicator

California

U.S. Average

How California Ranks

Expenditure per student (NCES)1

$ 7,905

$8,809

30th

Cost-adjusted expenditure per student (EdWeek)2

$7,081

$8,973

46th

K-12 expenditures per $1000 in personal income3

$38 per $1,000

$41 per $1,000

33rd

Teachers per 1,000 pupils4

48.0

63.9

49th

Guidance counselors per 1,000 pupils4

1.1

2.1

51st

Librarians per 1,000 pupils4

0.2

1.1

51st

Number of students per instructional computer5

5.1

3.8

n/a

Percent of students with computer in classroom5

44%

49.5%

n/a

Percent of students with computer in lab/media center5

60%

77%

n/a

Sources:
1. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 2004-2005
2. 2005 figure from Education Week, Quality Counts 2008
3. 2004 figures, National Education Association’s Ranking and Estimates, 2006–07

4. NCES, Common Core of Data, 2005–06
5. Education Week, Technology Counts 2007

EdSource 3/08

 

Teacher Salary and Expenditure Comparisons for 2005-2006

 

California Rank in U.S.

California Average

U.S. Average

Top

Bottom

Teachers' salaries
(2005-06)

1

$59,825

$49,026

$59,825
(California)

$34,709
(South Dakota)

Expenditures per pupil (2005-06)

29

$8,486

$9,100

$15,508
(District of Columbia)

$5,347
(Utah)

Public school revenue
(2003-04) per $1,000
personal income in 2004

26

$46

$47

$60
(Vermont)

$29
(District of
Columbia)

Per capital personal
income (2004)

12

$35,172

$33,041

$52,101
(District of Columbia)

$24,379
(Mississippi)

Note: The numbers in this table are based on full enrollment data. The District of Columbia is included among the states.
National Education Association's
Rankings & Estimates, 2006-07
EdSource 11/07

 

School and District Staffing Ratios in California and Other Large States

Staff per 1,000 Pupils in 2005-06

 

New York

Texas

Illinois

U.S. Average

Florida

California

California's Rank

% National Average

Total Staff

132.7

 137.1

125.4

124.7

117.5

90.0

50

72%

Total District Staff*

8.6

2.9

5.7

5.7

6.6

5.0

35

88%

Officials and Administrators

1.1

1.8

1.8

1.3

0.7

0.4

47

33%

School Staff*

103.8

99.7

96.0

95.2

87.0

70.0

51

74%

Principals/Asst. Principals

3.1

7.0

3.1

3.4

2.7

2.2

49

63%

Teachers

77.8

66.8

63.4

63.9

59.4

48.0

49

75%

Guidance Counselors

2.4

2.3

1.5

2.1

2.1

1.1

51

52%

Librarians

1.2

1.1

1.0

1.1

1.0

0.2

51

17%

Total Certified School Staff

84.5

77.2

69.0

70.5

65.3

51.5

49

73%

Note: The District of Columbia is included with the 50 states.
*District and school totals include classified staff.

Data: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Common Core of Data, 2005-06.
EdSource 11/07


The Foundation’s approach to K-12 school reform in California has three strands:  (1) supporting research and policy analysis of the state’s school finance and accountability systems as well as about the conditions of education broadly, (2) stimulating awareness and public engagement in school reform issues among Californians, and (3) supporting innovative approaches to improving the quality of academic instruction in the state’s demographically diverse public schools.

 

Grant Highlights

Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE)
Enriching California's education policy

EdSource
Providing the public with California education policy news and data

Californians for Justice
Connecting community organizing with statewide reform efforts

Quality Education Commission
Identifying the resources needed to help all California students meet state academic performance standards

UCLA
Developing a campaign to inform the California public about the state of education in the state


 

Ed-Data
Just Schools California
The Public Policy Institute of California

 

To read about Hewlett Foundation grantees in the news, click here.

Last revised: 6/9/2008

Copyright © 2003-2008 The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
All rights reserved.